It's hard to say whether it's true or not. Apart from whether it's an official work of Qianlong, the jadeite embedded in this ring, if it's true, is a valuable thing. The visibility should be ice green jadeite. The value of this jade is tens of thousands of dollars. It's difficult to judge whether it's a work of Qianlong's office. The reason is that you haven't photographed the key points, and the style and shape of this piece are not clear, Moreover, the inlaying process of Cui is not seen. In addition, such a ring is definitely not integrally formed, but is spliced. The connection process of the splicing point is not visible, and the material is not clear. Therefore, the key information is missing, and it is impossible to determine the age
It's fake. First of all, the ring is still very few years old. The font is very similar to the computer font, and the lines have traces of aging in fact, the identification is very simple. It's hard to say about jadeite, but the ring must be gold. Go to the gold shop and find someone to look at it. If it is not gold, it must be fake. If the purity of gold is too high, it is also fake. The purity of ancient gold was very low.
As shown in Figure 1, this ring has a living interface
P>
this shows that the ring was not customized for very noble people p>
Figure 1 and Figure 2 were found on the Internet. The material and workmanship are not as good as yours. Figure 3 is yours. You can compare them p>
collect it well p>
(the picture is taken from Baidu pictures)
It's hard to say whether it's true or not. Apart from whether it's an official work of Qianlong, the jadeite embedded in this ring, if it's true, is a valuable thing. The visibility should be ice green jadeite. The value of this jade is tens of thousands of dollars. It's difficult to judge whether it's a work of Qianlong's office. The reason is that you haven't photographed the key points, and the style and shape of this piece are not clear, Moreover, the inlaying process of Cui is not seen. In addition, such a ring is definitely not integrally formed, but is spliced. The connection process of the splicing point is not visible, and the material is not clear. Therefore, the key information is missing, and it is impossible to determine the age
It's fake. First of all, the ring is still very few years old. The font is very similar to the computer font, and the lines have traces of aging
in fact, the identification is very simple. It's hard to say about jadeite, but the ring must be gold. Go to the gold shop and find someone to look at it. If it is not gold, it must be fake. If the purity of gold is too high, it is also fake. The purity of ancient gold was very low.
Qianlong year system refers to the genuine map? It's too beautiful jade. It's green all over. I dare not estimate it
I think this should be genuine. If you don't believe it, you can go to the cultural relics appraisal Bureau or find some collectors to collect it.